{"id":3838,"date":"2014-01-31T17:07:41","date_gmt":"2014-01-31T17:07:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spontaneousdevelopment.com\/sdnuggets\/?p=3838"},"modified":"2014-01-31T17:25:07","modified_gmt":"2014-01-31T17:25:07","slug":"is-your-in-house-experts-ego-costing-your-company-money-part-2-of-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/is-your-in-house-experts-ego-costing-your-company-money-part-2-of-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Your In-House Expert's Ego Costing Your Company Money? - Part 2 of 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>In this   second \u2013 and concluding part \u2013 of this article (<a href=\"http:\/\/spontaneousdevelopment.com\/sdnuggets\/is-your-in-house-experts-ego-costing-your-company-money-part-1-of-2\/\" target=\"blank\">read Part 1 of 2 here<\/a>) <\/em>, I offer practical suggestions (based on the true success story of a large multinational company) about how businesses can help their in-house experts act, more often, in the best interest of the company.<br \/>\n.<\/p>\n<h3>  The In-House Expert's Ideal Role Is To Add  Tangible Value With His\/Her Unique Expertise<\/h3>\n<p>A manufacturing multinational company once  had a challenge finding a commercial off-the-shelf software application to  comprehensively handle routine data handling and report generation needs of its  factory production processes.<\/p>\n<p>Despite repeated efforts to use some of the  more popular commercial software, they found a lot of the peculiarities in  their production process could not be efficiently catered for via customisation  of the purchased software. There was - among others - a requirement for  whatever software they used to be able to generate reports conforming to an already  existing \"house format\". <\/p>\n<h3>Following some discussions, it was agreed  that an in-house solution be developed.<\/h3>\n<p>The alternative adopted was a custom  automated Lotus 1-2-3 based application built from scratch by a\u00a0young  expatriate middle level manager\u00a0over a period of some months. Basically,  he went around with a laptop speaking with those involved in data generation,  analysis and reporting from the Corporate Headquarters to the factories,  Purchasing departments, Production Planning, Engineering Utilities etc.<\/p>\n<p>Using the information he gathered, in  conjunction with various recording\/reporting formats he saw being used in the  different units(and his knowledge as an insider with experience in most of the  key operations), he built an application that allowed entry of raw factory  performance data and which automatically computed the company's Standard Key  Performance Indicators.<\/p>\n<p>The application also automatically produced  a one-page report that identified TEN(10) specific areas in which the company  had OVER spent and UNDER spend respectively. This was displayed in an  automatically generated comparison table, expressing the amounts SAVED or LOST  in usage units (e.g. Kgs per litre of product) and monetary unit (e.g. Dollars  per litre of product). <\/p>\n<p><strong>On the same page was also an auto-generated Variable  Cost Analysis chart and four process charts showing the progressive trend in  key waste control parameters over a 12 month period.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The best part was that this nifty program  was built using an already familiar spreadsheet application, in a way that a  reasonably skilled user could easily make needed changes as the need arose over  time. Following reviews, the application was immediately put to use in  preparing reports sent monthly from the factories to Headquarters, and also for  the Monthly Review meetings held with Directors.<\/p>\n<h3>The In-House Expert's Ideal Mental  Attitude: Objective & Results-Focussed<\/h3>\n<p>I have narrated the above true  story,\u00a0with names etc removed \"to protect the innocent\" \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>It illustrates the fact that senior decision makers in the technical  function (a group of in-house experts) of the company did some good QUALITY  thinking. This was with the obvious objective outlook being to SOLVE the data handling  and reporting problem being experienced. <\/p>\n<p>They liased with the IT department  (ANOTHER group of in-house experts) to consider and test possible solutions. Over time they settled for a customised, simple, yet highly effective\/flexible  solution which they then found someone to develop and implement.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>These senior technical managers - as well  as the IT - managers functioned PROPERLY and successfully as the In-House  Experts they were EXPECTED to be.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h3>They had the final say in terms of  recommending what <strong>could<\/strong> be done to the company. <\/h3>\n<p>They could have INSISTED that  the company improvise with the less flexible commercial off-the-shelf  applications, and probably the top management etc would have gone along.<\/p>\n<p>But a lot of things would have suffered,  and the main problem of poor data handling\/standardisation and reporting would  have persisted. <\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Instead, they wisely remained objective and open minded enough  to see that the unique problem in the technical function required a unique  solution. <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>They must have left their minds \"open\" long enough for  someone (possibly the\u00a0young expatriate Training Coordinator\u00a0himself)  to \"sell\" them the idea of using an automated spreadsheet application  to solve the problem.<\/p>\n<h3>And that's how in-house experts can justify  their presence in, and earnings from the company:\u00a0<\/h3>\n<p>By adding REAL value to  the company in such a way that it becomes better equipped to achieve its  business goals more successfully. If they act this way often, the company they  represent is unlikely to miss valuable OPPORTUNITIES to get - and STAY - ahead  of the competition. <\/p>\n<p><em>This is because it would be fully equipped to seize those  opportunities as\/when they appear using the INSIGHT of its results-oriented  in-house experts.<\/em><\/p>\n<h3><strong>Note:\u00a0<\/strong>The young expatriate developer  of the above mentioned program, was not an IT person. <\/h3>\n<p>He was a manager in the  technical function, who happened to have a flair for numbers and had also  developed his spreadsheet programming skills quite extensively.<\/p>\n<h3>Your Company Needs \"Non-Partisan\"  In-House Experts<\/h3>\n<p>To help you realise how NOT addressing the  issues I have raised here can make your company MISS great opportunities to  advance in quantum leaps, I reproduce below just ONE of many available  quotes(you probably know some yourself!) credited to \"in-house expert\"  representatives of companies. <\/p>\n<p><em>These experts confidently gave the following  WRITTEN assessment (to top management) of a new idea\/concept\/innovation that  went on to CHANGE the world!<\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cThis \u2018telephone\u2019 has too many shortcomings  to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is  inherently of no value to us\u201d.\u00a0\u2013 Western Union Internal Memo, 1876<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3>Can you imagine just how STUPID anyone who  took the advice of the guys who wrote the above mentioned memo MUST have felt  AFTER seeing demand for the telephone in business and society skyrocket?!  <\/h3>\n<p>That's the price one can end up paying for FAILING to remember that EXPERTS  will always be human. Which makes it necessary to constantly check and ensure  their human weaknesses do not prevent them from delivering EXPERT quality  results as often as possible - in the BEST interests of the organisation!<\/p>\n<h3>Summary - Set Up Systems To Help Your  In-House Experts KEEP Doing Their Jobs Properly<\/h3>\n<p>So what's going to happen when next some  unknown, inconsequential looking individual walks into your company lobby...and  says s\/he has a product or service or IDEA s\/he believes your company will find  useful? <\/p>\n<p><em>What will you want your gatekeepers from reception, to your personal  assistant(s) and of course the \"in-house\" experts to DO before they  send him\/her away?<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>In my opinion, it would not hurt to arrange  for certain members of your team to give formal appointments to - and meet for  a limited time. <\/strong>With individuals who come in sounding coherent, purposeful and  convincing enough to the gatekeepers.<\/p>\n<h3>The fact that your company is BIG does not  mean a (seemingly) \"small\" person cannot have a BIG idea that can make  your company bigger! <\/h3>\n<p><em>And THAT is the classic mistake many people make -  especially when they feel they are \"successful\" or more successful  than the person who approaches them!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>You might also want to set up a system for  documentation, collation and careful REVIEW of EVERY idea, suggestion or  proposal that is made on paper or verbally, by employees or outsiders, formally  or informally, for their potential uses and applications.<\/p>\n<h3>Sometimes the solution you seek to a  challenge being faced by your company can reveal itself to you, when you OPEN  your mind. <\/h3>\n<p>Consider the IDEA(S) or SUGGESTION(S) a junior employee - or unknown  outsider service provider who offers to give a talk for instance - says s\/he  has. <\/p>\n<p>It will only be a matter of time before doing so yields   benefits that result in significant improvements in your company's  productivity, profitability etc.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this second \u2013 and concluding part \u2013 of this article (read Part 1 of 2 here) , I offer practical suggestions (based on the true success story of a large multinational company) about how businesses can help their in-house experts act, more often, in the best interest of the company. . The In-House Expert's [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,8,266],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-employeescareer-persons","category-entrepreneurs","category-my-dn-travel-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"views":1507,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3838","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3838"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3838\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8283,"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3838\/revisions\/8283"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/tayosolagbade.com\/sdnuggets\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}